The Race to AGI: When Will We Reach Artificial General Intelligence?

Imagine an AI that’s as versatile and clever as a human – one moment solving a complex business strategy puzzle, the next moment inventing a new scientific theory. That’s the vision of artificial general intelligence (AGI), and it has experts both excited and anxious.

We’ll explore what AGI really means and how it differs from today’s AI, dive into predictions from leading AI figures like Demis Hassabis of Google DeepMind and others on when AGI might arrive, and discuss the far-reaching implications for business and society. We’ll look at the potential benefits – from turbocharging innovation and productivity to tackling humanity’s biggest challenges – as well as serious risks such as job displacement, economic inequality, and ethical dilemmas. Finally, we’ll consider how AGI could reshape the future of work, why we may need to rethink economic models in a world with less human labour, and which human skills will still shine in an AI-driven economy.

Let’s break it down in plain language, with a focus on what business leaders need to know, and a friendly nudge to prepare for the changes on the horizon.

What Is AGI and How Is It Different from Today’s AI?

Before jumping into timelines, let’s clarify what AGI actually is. Today’s AI systems (often called “narrow AI”) are very good at specific tasks – such as recognising faces, translating languages, or recommending films – but they operate within a limited domain. Artificial General Intelligence, on the other hand, refers to a still-hypothetical form of AI that can understand or learn any intellectual task a human being can and apply its intelligence broadly, across different domains. In simple terms, AGI wouldn’t be confined to the tasks it was trained on. Instead, it could reason, plan, and adapt to new challenges much like a person would, whether it’s driving a car, writing a novel, or solving an equation it has never seen before. There’s no universally accepted test or definition for AGI yet, but many use “human-level cognition” as a shorthand.

How is that different from the AI we use now? Think of current AI as a collection of savants – brilliant in one area, clueless outside it. For example, a chess AI can trounce any grandmaster at chess but can’t hold a conversation or do your taxes. AGI would be more like a well-rounded thinker or a very quick learner: it could transfer knowledge from one field to another. This is a massive leap from narrow AI, and achieving it is something of a “holy grail” in technology. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman even suggests AGI could “elevate humanity” by enhancing productivity, creating abundance, and unlocking new knowledge. Of course, getting to AGI is easier said than done – which is why experts often debate when (or even if) we’ll get there.

Predictions on the AGI Timeline – What Tech Leaders Are Saying

Is AGI right around the corner, or decades away? It depends whom you ask. Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind (and a leading figure in AI), has maintained that machines with human-level reasoning are probably at least a decade away. In a recent briefing, Hassabis estimated we’re “five to ten years” from AGI – meaning it could be sometime in the 2030s before we see AI that can truly match human cognition. This is a more conservative stance compared to some of his peers. For instance, Sam Altman of OpenAI has expressed a more aggressive timeline. In a blog post reflecting on OpenAI’s progress, Altman stated that the team is confident they “know how to build AGI” and even predicted that the first rudimentary AGI agents could be joining the workforce by 2025. That’s right – according to Altman, we might see early forms of general intelligence in action within just a couple of years, not decades.

Others fall somewhere in between or throw in caution. The renowned Geoffrey Hinton, often referred to as the “godfather of AI”, made headlines when he revised his timeline and suggested there’s roughly a 50% chance that AI could be smarter than humans in 5 to 20 years. Hinton’s revised timeline is startling because, only a few years ago, many believed AGI was much further off. Meanwhile, Andrew Ng urges scepticism, remarking, “I hope we get there in our lifetime, but I’m not sure,” and cautioning against buying into the hype that AGI is imminent. Similarly, Yann LeCun, Chief AI Scientist at Meta, maintains that AGI “is not around the corner” and might still be many years, if not decades, away. LeCun also emphasises that we shouldn’t expect a sudden “big bang” moment where someone flips a switch and AGI appears; rather, if it ever happens, it will likely be through gradual progress and a series of small advances.

Surveys of AI experts have produced a broad range of estimates, reflecting the uncertainty in this field. For business leaders, that uncertainty means we should prepare for multiple scenarios: AGI could surprise us and arrive early, or it could remain a distant dream.

What Could AGI Do? Potential Benefits for Business and Humanity

Why are companies racing toward AGI in the first place? Because the upside is enormous. Proponents believe AGI could usher in a new era of innovation, efficiency, and even help solve problems that have stymied us for ages. Sam Altman views AGI as a tool that will “enhance productivity” and “increase abundance” for society, allowing us to create far more value with less toil. Imagine an AI that can research and design new drugs or materials round the clock, or an AI assistant that can handle mundane tasks in your company, freeing human employees to focus on creative strategy and complex decision-making. In the business context, AGI could become the ultimate knowledge worker – able to rapidly learn any domain, from finance to law to marketing, and generate insights or carry out tasks at superhuman speed. This could dramatically boost innovation and output; indeed, economists at Goldman Sachs project that advanced AI (on the path to AGI) could raise global GDP by 7% (almost £7 trillion) over a 10-year period, thanks to significant productivity gains.

Beyond productivity, AGI could help tackle so-called “moonshot” challenges. According to a recent analysis published in Nature, a sufficiently advanced AI might tackle thorny global problems – including climate change, pandemics, and finding cures for diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer’s. These are issues that have long stumped human experts. An AGI, with its ability to analyse and reason across vast data and disciplines, could simulate breakthroughs or suggest innovative solutions. For businesses, this means new opportunities and markets – curing a disease creates value in healthcare; solving climate challenges can spawn entire industries in clean energy and sustainability.

There’s also a collaborative vision for AGI. Rather than seeing it as a replacement for humans, many experts imagine AGI as a powerful tool working alongside people. Think of it as an ultra-smart assistant that augments human capabilities. Employees armed with AGI could achieve far more in less time, whether it’s writing software, negotiating deals (with AI crunching numbers and forecasting risks in the background), or designing products. New business models could emerge that were previously inconceivable. For instance, personalised education delivered by an AI tutor for every student, or automatically generated virtual environments for training and entertainment. The innovation potential is immense – some have likened AGI to having “a country of geniuses in a data centre” at your disposal.

The Risks and Challenges: Job Disruption, Inequality, and Ethical Dilemmas

It’s not all rosy. The flip side of AGI’s potential is a set of very real concerns. Perhaps the most immediate worry for many is job displacement. If you thought current AI automation was disruptive, AGI could be automation on steroids. A widely cited report by Goldman Sachs estimated that generative AI (a stepping stone towards AGI) could expose 300 million full-time jobs to automation in the coming years. This isn’t just about factory or clerical jobs, but also white-collar roles that involve routine analysis or documentation. Entire job categories might be redefined or even eliminated. This raises the spectre of unemployment and upheaval in the labour market on a scale not seen since the Industrial Revolution. Even if new roles are eventually created, the short-term transition could be very painful, and those who do not upskill in time might be left behind. The risk of growing economic inequality is substantial: if the benefits of AGI accrue mainly to company owners or those with the skills to build and operate these systems, the gap between the tech-savvy and others may widen further.

Business leaders also fret about ethical and security risks. An AGI would be incredibly powerful – and if misaligned with human values or placed in the wrong hands, it could cause significant harm. For example, an AGI tasked solely with maximising profits might pursue reckless strategies, potentially manipulating markets or customers. Concerns about AI safety and control are significant; if an AGI becomes much smarter than us, ensuring that it behaves in a manner consistent with human values becomes a daunting challenge. Prominent voices in tech have even compared the potential dangers of uncontrolled AGI to “summoning a demon.” Although such language might sound hyperbolic, the underlying concern is that an ultra-intelligent system might eventually operate outside our control, making it imperative to develop robust oversight mechanisms. Ensuring reliability, transparency in decision-making, and the ability to audit AI actions are essential, especially when human lives or major economic decisions are at stake.

How AGI Could Transform the Future of Work

One of the biggest questions for everyday people is: what does AGI mean for my job and the future of work? Historically, technology has displaced some jobs while creating new ones. The printing press put scribes out of work but created printers and editors; the automobile displaced horse-drawn carriages but led to mechanics, engineers, and new forms of logistics. With AI, this cycle continues – but AGI could accelerate the pace of change to an unprecedented level. A study by Goldman Sachs found that about 60% of today’s workers are in occupations that did not exist in 1940, a stark reminder of how technological revolutions create new roles even as they disrupt old ones. However, the short-term effects could be harsh if AGI automates tasks faster than new roles are generated.

Adaptation will be key. We might need to rethink our economic models and social contracts to accommodate a world with significantly reduced human labour in certain areas. Ideas such as Universal Basic Income (UBI) – where citizens receive a baseline income to cover living costs – are gaining fresh attention as a potential means to distribute the benefits of automation more equitably. Some have also proposed a shorter working week (for example, shifting to a four-day week) so that productivity gains from AI translate into improved quality of life rather than just higher output.

Education and upskilling are also crucial. In an AI-driven economy, there will be high demand for individuals who can build, manage, and collaborate with intelligent machines. This means that digital skills, data literacy, and a solid understanding of AI will become as fundamental as reading and writing. Governments and companies alike will need to invest heavily in retraining programmes to help workers transition into emerging roles. Even though technology will take over many routine tasks, uniquely human skills such as creativity, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence are likely to remain in high demand.

The Human Advantage: Skills That Will Remain in Demand

Here’s a reassuring insight: even the most advanced AI struggles with tasks that come naturally to humans. Creativity, critical thinking, interpersonal skills, and emotional intelligence – these are areas where people excel and machines continue to lag behind. For example, while an AGI might rapidly analyse data to propose a business strategy, a human leader uses judgement, intuition, and empathy to decide which strategy best fits the company’s culture and values. Creative and strategic roles rely on originality and a human touch that is hard to replicate algorithmically. Likewise, jobs that require complex human interaction (think counsellors, nurses, teachers, and sales professionals building lasting relationships) depend on emotional intelligence and social nuance.

So, as AGI rises, what skills should workers focus on? Key areas include problem-solving in unstructured situations (identifying and solving problems without clear guidelines), creativity and innovation, leadership and teamwork, and emotional and social intelligence. In essence, a commitment to lifelong learning and adaptability will be the most important assets, enabling individuals to work effectively alongside AI. A data analyst might evolve into an “AI-enhanced strategist” – utilising AI to handle routine analysis while focusing on higher-level decision-making. Similarly, a customer service representative might transition into a “customer experience manager”, overseeing AI support systems while providing the human touch for complex issues.

Preparing for an AGI-Powered World

Artificial General Intelligence might still sound like science fiction, but the consensus is that it’s a matter of when, not if. It could be five years, ten years, or longer – but given the rapid progress in AI, businesses and policymakers cannot afford to be caught off guard. The time to prepare is now. This means investing in upskilling and education to ensure that employees can adapt to the evolving technological landscape. It also means rethinking organisational structures to foster effective human-AI collaboration, ensuring that the benefits of increased productivity are shared broadly across society.

For business leaders, the call to action is clear: if technology is replacing jobs faster than it is creating new ones, we must change our economic models to account for the reduction of human labour in the workforce. We need to invest in upskilling and ensure that workers acquire the uniquely human skills – creativity, critical thinking, and emotional intelligence – that machines struggle to replicate. Policymakers must also get involved by updating educational curricula and social support systems to safeguard against the potential downsides of rapid technological change.

Let’s be proactive in harnessing the immense potential of AGI while ensuring that the future of work is equitable and sustainable. The future of work is being written as we speak – and with thoughtful action, we can write a future where technology and people prosper together.

References