Skip to content
Immersive Technology

Open vs Closed Metaverse: For Beginners

Jamie Bykov-Brett Jamie Bykov-Brett · 12 July 2022 · 2 min read
Editorial digital collage, B&W photographic cut-outs, cream paper background, bold geometric colour blocks, constructivist poster influence, surreal symbolic composition, tactile handmade feel, related to the subject of Open vs Closed Metaverse: For Beginners

Web 3.0, VR, AR, 5G, blockchain, crypto, NFTs, and other technologies, alongside the rise of remote work and online socialisation, make the metaverse's arrival a relevant and significant development.

The most-used internet platforms and services have become integral to everyday life, yet they are owned by only a handful of tech companies. These companies have shifted from being service providers to gatekeepers, controlling which creators can access their platforms, deciding who reaches the widest audience, and determining who can build a career from their work.

We are in the early stages of the metaverse's development, but this is where we could realise what many people always hoped the internet would be: a place where you benefit from your participation online. The alternative is to replicate the same models that currently govern our online world, only in 3D.

These competing visions are referred to as an 'open' and 'closed' metaverse.

A closed metaverse has a fixed infrastructure, controlled by a single organisation or government. Several businesses have announced they are building their own metaverses, committing significant financial resources, talent, and expertise. Many tech companies don't just want to build the metaverse, they want to own it.

Web3 and digital economic justice advocates argue that the often exploitative Web2 model of digital governance has had its day. They believe people should be supporting the pursuit of an open metaverse instead.

There are many definitions of an open metaverse. The one used here draws from what I consider the most impactful:

"An open metaverse would be a virtual version of our material world with no predetermined physics. It would be decentralised, community-owned, community-governed, and freely interoperable, with privacy built-in."

From a Web3 perspective, the metaverse must be a shared space. Were a single entity to become the dominant gatekeeper, it would hold power greater than any tech company currently wields.

The hope for many is that the metaverse will be built on Web3 principles, decentralised, as opposed to being governed by governments and companies as the internet is today. Many working in metaverse spaces believe it needs to be a place where creators and users actually own their content and data, rather than placing control in the hands of a select few.

The successful vision of the metaverse will ultimately be decided by you, the end user. You'll vote with where, how, and in what kind of metaverse you choose to participate, as well as through consumer spending power. It is up to you to insist that it is built on decentralised Web3 principles.

Share this article
LinkedIn X Email
Jamie Bykov-Brett

Jamie Bykov-Brett

Listed as one of Engatica's World's Top 200 Business and Technology Innovators, Jamie is an AI and automation consultant who helps organisations move from curiosity to confident daily use. As founder of Bykov-Brett Enterprises and co-founder of the Executive AI Institute, he designs AI upskilling programmes that have delivered 86% daily adoption rates and a 9.7/10 NPS. His work sits at the intersection of technology implementation and human development, with a focus on responsible governance, practical tooling, and making AI accessible to every level of an organisation.

Get AI Insights Delivered

Practical perspectives on AI adoption and the future of work. No spam.

Related Articles